[Air-L] International Symposium: Platform Work, Epistemologies, grey zones, North-South, Brazil, December

[Rafael Do Nascimento Grohmann]

Hi AoIR,
Circulating this call for an event in Brazil, in December. The message was sent by Donna Kesselman.



Please find below and attached a Call for Papers that might interest you. Feel free to circulate if you wish and rendez-vous in São Carlos in December!

All the best,

Donna

English, français, español, portugês (PDF attached)



Call for Papers, International Symposium

December 10-11, 2024

 “Digital Platforms: The Epistemology of the North-South Comparison. An Analysis of Grey Zones”

Institut d’architecture et d’urbanisme [Institute of Architecture and Urbanism] (IAU), Université de São Paulo [University of Sao Palo](USP) and Université fédérale de São Carlos [Federal University of São Carlos](UFSCar)

How should we understand the ways that digital work, always increasingly elusive, transforms and recomposes employment norms? How can these phenomena be compared across distinct national contexts?

While the binaries of the welfare state–employment and unemployment, for instance–have been undermined, they still inform the ideology and jurisdiction of existing labor institutions and criteria regulating access to social protection. In the absence of a theoretical consensus on the who or what the paradigmatic post-Fordist “worker” is, attempts at adapting either worker organization or state welfare often run aground in part because of this theoretical and strategic ambiguity (Valdez, 2023, Riesgo, 2023). These older norms still remain cognitive reference points in diverse locales, despite their geo-historical grounding in advanced Global North countries. This limitation is an obstacle to understanding emerging developments in work occurring in other national contexts and to developing a dynamic and comprehensive epistemology that would enhance our understanding of the recompositions underway.

The blurring of legal distinctions between the canonic figures of Fordism–subordinated employee or independent worker (Supiot, 2000)–has given way to countless dynamics of grey zones from the core of the standard employment relationship to its outer borders. (Bureau, Corsani, Giraud, Rey 2019). These changes assume new significance with the advent of digital platforms that disrupt the responsibilities, hierarchies and rationales of subordination and power in the context of work (Carelli, Cingolani, Kesselman, 2022). Such blurring also exists in the Global South, where the social state emerged belatedly and brought with it genuine but fragile rights. We must also consider the impact of digital work on the situation of generalized informality in Global South countries where, depending on the period, the state and municipalities navigate between repressing and facilitating informal activities, while entertaining ambiguous relations with the platforms.

Comparisons between the Global North and South will help us better assess what is common to employment standards globally, their regulations and underlining relationships, and–in a more comprehensive frame–the citizenship norms that they are tightly braided with. (For instance, citizenship is linked to the carteira de trabalho in the Brazilian case, even though informality affects half the workers in this country and therefore excludes them.) Rights have been progressively curtailed through labor market reforms (such as in France, 2016 and 2017 or in Brazil, 2017), which has contributed to a spawning of self-employed independent workers who became a captive workforce of platforms promoting themselves as “job creators”. In the case of the South, we have witnessed a naturalization and a recomposition of informality under the disguise of self-entrepreneurship—“be your own boss” Comparisons between the Global North and South will help us better assess what is common to employment standards globally, their regulations and underlining relationships, and the citizenship norms that they are tightly braided with. —and  flexible work (Lim a, Bridi, 2019; Lima, Oliveira, 2022).

Grey zones also emerge from sources other than the deterioration of the standard employment relationship’s institutional frameworks, with different dimensions in the North and South. The epistemology of the platforms’ economic models takes as its point of departure the decentralized organization of work between distinct clienteles in the two-sided market. Algorithmic and triangular management practices–platform-client-providerinvolve a series of centrifugal forces within ecosystems that organize the disarticulation of work from employment and its social protections. This is how they succeed in bypassing public regulation in the North and the particular forms of work regulation in the South, where informal work is managed in urban spaces (Dieuaide, 2024; Dieuaide, Azaïs, 2020; Minassian, 2011; Kiesling, 2018). In their own fashion, digital platforms thereby “modernize” work relations and bring about their recomposition.

By setting up public management departments digital platforms have positioned themselves as “rule makers” in attempts to impose a “third figure of digital app worker” within every specific local context (Azaïs, Dieuaide, Kesselman, 2017). Such strategies muddy the waters and contribute to fuelling grey zones of work and of employment.

What horizon for emancipation?

Might one say that all these realities can be subsumed under the advent of “platform capitalism” (Leite, del Bono, Lima, 2023; Srnicek, 2016; Abdelnour, Bernard, 2018) or of the “gig economy” (Huws, Spencer, Syrdal, Holts , 2017; Vallas, Schor, 2020)? In any case, this ecompositions pose a challenge for any attempt at comprehensive regulation of work. The core issue always arises: is there a break or continuity between the standard employment relationship and the welfare state (Carelli, Dieuaide, Kesselman 2022)? Or, alternatively, is this a new mode of production altogether? Is there a “meta-category,” like “digital labor” or “platform workers,” or are there salient characteristics that distinguish these new kinds of laborers from each other? (Brodersen, Dufresne, Joukovsky, Vitali 2024; Casilli, 2019). Are the changes in platform work and its “ambivalent” nature in the North really comparable to these emerging regimes of labor in the South? (Rizek, Rangel, 2023; Machado, Zanoni 2022; Fioravanti, Rangel, Rizek, 2022; Abílio, 2020; Flichy, 2019)? Or is the digital “fourth industrial revolution” nothing more than just another new western-centred paradigm (Leterme, 2019)? What about the driving role of finance and of successive crises (Sauviat, 2019)? Is the proliferation of digital work by multinational platforms sufficient to lay the bases for a truly globalized world labor market? If not, what would be the necessary conditions to do so? Is emancipation through work and employment still a horizon that mobilizes digital workers in the Global North and in the Global South and between them?

Today, most app drivers and food couriers are racialized workers, from the descendants of slaves in Brazil and the United States to the postcolonial immigrants in France. This now established statistical reality (Dablanc, Aguilera, Krier, Cognez, Chretien, Louvet, 2022; Santos, Carelli, 2022), interfaces with racialized representations of platform work associated with precarious, low-wage jobs (Van Doorn, Ferrari, Graham, 2023, Dubal, 2022). To what degree are these regimes of racialization driven by what some have called platform capitalism (Marchadour, 2024, Gebrial, 2022; Bernard, 2023)? This opens a discussion from the perspective of the margins concerning the very nature of platforms in capitalism. Santos’s approach (2022: 16) in terms of “tough areas” and “soft areas” which “structure the ‘invisible borders’ in the social space of social relations that impose constraints on undesired individuals or groups in particular places and contexts” echoes the notion of the grey zone.

What analytical tools to use?

We are interested in tools that can consider transformations and reconfigurations of work and of employment, in the wake of the development of digital platforms, and we propose to compare experiences rooted in the Global North and South. What are the interactions and limitations when transposing preconceived and Eurocentric notions such as the salaried workforce (le salariat) and legal subordination, the formal-informal duality (Archambault, Greffe, 1984), entrepreneurship, citizenship, the nation, etc.? What are the terms of “decentering comparative analysis”, those capable of analyzing similarities and differences within a global frame (Giraud, Lallement, 2022)? Are there developments that circulate to the heartlands of global capitalism from the South, whose less restrictive regulatory environments the platforms use as a laboratory for their technological and economic models, an example being accelerating informality?  (Huws, Surie, 2023)? Their adaptability to local constraints is at the heart of these new business models: in the South, what are the conceptual tools that are needed to effectively interpret the “contextual otherness and endogenous causalities” that are specific to these national and cultural contexts (Soussi, Sadik, 2020)? Thus, the importance of epistemologies of the Souths. In short, how should one account for the tensions between micro and macro and, more generally, the definition of scales of analysis? How do the categories employed—both by actors and researchers—fit into and make sense of these scales?

To renew paradigms for the investigate of platform work, there must also be reflection upon the geographical and symbolic meaning of physical and virtual territories. This is especially true for location-based platforms. Our proposal to compare situated micro-cases is aimed at avoiding the risk of essentializing a macro scale that posits the existence of a “Center” in balance with a “Periphery”, that is contrasted with a micro scale that confines the agency of actors to a local and immediate space, not accounting for more complex and historical social relations.  (De Vito, 2019). While the cases are situated in diverse forms of territories and contexts, our privileged terrain of analysis for studying passenger app drivers and couriers–meals and food shopping–is the metropolis, which we believe should be studied from a “trans-urban approach” (Cuppini, Frapporti,2022). Thus, the urban space should be conceived of as a field of tensions where platforms directly invest in public affairs, announcing their role as actors of innovation and public planning.

We are seeking to identify the connections and circulations of objects, norms, regulations, and practices of platform work which are, indeed, comparable and can be conceived of as part of a global totality (Douki, Minard, 2007). How can we compare the indigenous categories used by the actors to portray such notions as work, occupational status, remuneration, protections, benefits and rights, and the way workers appropriate their local communities and territories? How do the new synchronizations of time, work-life balance and workers’ embeddedness in territories interweave with the blurring of workers’ private lives due to the “colonization of daily life” by platforms (Cingolani, 2021)? What are the consequences of struggle waged by workers–either individually or collectively–to resist or adhere to these new models of work (Brugière, Kesselman, Vandewattyne, 2024; Dufresne, Leterne, 2021)?

What is the impact of recent legal rulings concerning reclassification of bogus employment? And what is the nature of the prominent role taken by the courts in the absence of robust regulation of digital platform work? On a more general level, one observes the destabilization, displacement and instrumentalization of institutions by platforms. The ultimate ambition of this cross-cutting analysis is the development of concepts and categories that can effectively speak to and facilitate the comparison of diverse instances of platform work and its insertion into a broader reflection concerning “the future of work.” (Dujarier, Frayssé, 2024; Herzog, Zimmermann, 2023).

An analysis of grey zones

We draw upon the heuristic tool of “grey zones of work and of employment”. Grey zones are spaces where the dynamics of disembeddedness and recomposition of work and employment become the critical object of study. They are more or less defined and instituted as their content, extent and duration are in constant motion. As As these grey zones are defined in a constantly changing national environments, comparing how they they subsumes term-to-term juxtapositions and provides a more thorough understanding of the processes underway, tracking the complex interaction of different elements (Kesselman, Soussi 2024, Bureau, Dieuaide, 2018; Bureau, Corsani, Giraud, Rey 2019; Boulin, Kesselman, 2018, Azaïs, Carleial, 2017; Siino, Soussi, 2017).

We rely on research that highlights the dynamics of grey zones in digital work. In all countries, grey zones constitute the heuristic tool that enables us to understand the “institutional instability”’ that is generated by neoliberalism and aggravated by the advent of platforms. This process considers the resistance of institutions, notably that of the judiciary, but which is often undermined by difficulties in setting precedent on which other judgements could rely (Carelli et al., 2021; Grillo, 2022/2024). Some governments participate actively in the construction of grey zones (Lehdonvirta, 2022; Bisom-Rapp, Coiquaud, 2017) via measures of self-regulation by the platforms or through the establishment of broad-based forums of social dialogue and of collective regulation which recognize new stake-holders as regulators, such as recently in France and in Brazil (Carelli, Kesselman, 2024). The same goes for the displacement of “orders and spaces of regulation” (Dirringer, 2022): platforms attempt to instrumentalize such transfers to their own advantage, notably at the time of their positioning as “rule makers” in the public space of regulation (Azaïs, Dieuaide, Kesselman, 2017). Platforms have been increasingly able to dictate public policy, thereby interfering with what was the jurisdiction of public powers. We perceive grey zones closest to the experience of work by focusing on its “hybridity” (Murgia, 2023) and “emerging figures in the grey zone” (Azaïs, 2019). The figures navigate within a “social work relationship” (RST), the enlarged space of relations of control, from which recompositions can be instituted in network firms, value chains or algorithmic management outside of any institutional frameworks (D’Amours, 2022; D'Amours, Briand, Bellemare, Hanin, Pogliaghi, 2023) Thus the grey zone is an approach that can help us parse the actual degree of “disruption” brought about by the new labor platform economy (Berins Collier, Dubal, Carter, 2018), separating the substantive changes from the ideological or catastrophist noises coming from all directions.

Ultimately, the questioning which structures of this conference could be summed up by the following formula: Is there a need for a specific epistemology to the study of digital work?

Contributions

The symposium intends to compare the experience of platform workers through that of the emblematic figures of passenger app drivers and couriers–meals and food shopping.

Contributions from interested parties would be welcome, amongst other angles, on:

●   situated case studies exploring the epistemology of their approach to research in this area;

●   the comparison and circulation of objects, norms, regulations and practices of platform work, as well as the evolution of platform business models from the perspective of their reception in national contexts, notably starting with experiences in the South;

●       the nature of a “platform capitalism” including, to follow one hypothesis, the degree to which it should be understood from the angle of racialization and its articulation with other social relations  (gender, class, etc.);

●       the study of grey zones, the social spaces of work and employment transformations and recompositions that are brought about by platform work and their comparison of national experiences between North and South;

●       the application of epistemologies of comparison, including a reflection on inter- and trans-disciplinarity, conceived in their “globality”.

Theoretical contributions on paradigms to provide adequate concepts and categories for new or renewed conditions produced by platform work in the North and in the South are also welcome.

What epistemplogy(ies) are necessary to study platform work?

This symposium is organized by the ANR research projet Regreyz&Co « Grey zones and Territory: Transformation of work and the emerging figure of Platform Worker. A France-Brazil comparison » (CNRS/FAPESP), in partnership with l'Université Paris-Est Créteil and the Law Faculty at Universidade de Paraná, Curitiba.



The Organization of the Symposium

Please send proposals (of a maximum 3,000 signs, including spaces) for papers in English, Spanish, French or Portuguese, with a short bio to: col.zonascinzentas at gmail.com<mailto:col.zonascinzentas at gmail.com> with copies to Donna Kesselman donna.kesselman at u-pec.fr<mailto:donna.kesselman at u-pec.fr>, Cibele Saliba Rizek cibelesr at sc.usp.br<mailto:cibelesr at sc.usp.br> and  Christian Azaïs christian.azais at lecnam.net<mailto:christian.azais at lecnam.net>

Deadline for submission: April 30, 2024

Response: May 30, 2024

The symposium will be held in person and, for certain speakers, remotely. Please indicate whether you intend to attend the live symposium or prefer to participate remotely to enable us to ensure academic, scientific and geographical balance.



Organizing Committee

Donna Kesselman, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC),  Sidnei Machado Sidnei, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Tomás Moreira,  Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), João Pedro Perin, Universidade Federal de São Carlos  (UFSCar), Aline Pires, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar),  Rangel Felipe, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCar)

Scientific Committee



Ludmilla C. Abílio, sociologie, Instituto de Estudos Avançados da USP (Brazil), Christian Azaïs, sociologie, LISE-CNAM (France), Adam Badger, economic geography, Newcastle University (Great Britain), Natacha Borgeaud-Garciandía, sociologia, Conicet (Argentine), Rodrigo Carelli, direito do trabalho, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro (Brasil), Antonio Casilli, sociologie, Institut Polytechnique de Paris (France), Patrick Cingolani, sociologie, Université de Paris-Cité (France), Martine D’Amours, sociologie, Université Laval (Québec), Patrick Dieuaide, économie, Sorbonne Nouvelle (France), Olivier Giraud, sciences politiques CNRS/LISE-CNAM (France), Sayonara Grillo Coutinho, direito do trabalho, Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro (Brasil), Rafael Grohmann, media studies, University of Toronto (Canada),  Lima Jacob Carlos, sociologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos (Brasil), Machado Sidnei, direito do trabalho, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR-Brasil), Guénolé Marchadour, sociologie, LISE-CNAM (France), Claire Marzo, droit du travail (Université Paris-Est  Créteil), Sawmiya Rajaram,  Jindal Global Law School, O.P Jindal Global University (India), Cibele Rizek, sociologia, Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo (USP) (Brasil), Maxime Schirrer, géographie, LIRSA CNAM (France),Roberto Véras de Oliveira, sociologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (Brasil), Cheolki Yoon, School of Social Communication, Saint-Paul University (Canada, South Korea).



Symposium Sponsoring Institutions



ANR (Agence nationale de la recherche), France

FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo)

IAU/USP (Instituto de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo em São Carlos)

UFSCar (Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Sociologia)

UFPR (Universidade Federal do Paraná, Faculdade de Direito, Curitiba)

Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC)

Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)



Bibliography



Abdelnour, S., Bernard S. (2018), « Vers un capitalisme de plateforme ? Mobiliser le travail, contourner les régulations », La Nouvelle Revue du Travail, 13.
https://journals.openedition.org/nrt/3797

Abílio L.C., Grohmann R. , Weiss H.C., (2021), Uberização: a era do trabalhador just-in-time? Journal of Labor and Society (2021) 1-19.

Abílio L.C. (2023), Uberization: The Periphery as the Future of Work?<https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-11462-5_5> », in, Aditi Surie<https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-11462-5#author-1-0>, Ursula Huws<https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-11462-5#author-1-1>, Platformization and Informality: Pathways of Change, Alteration, and Transformation, London, Palgrave Macmillan, Pages 139-160.

Aguilera A., Krier C., Cognez C., Chretien J., et al. (2022), Etude 2022 sur les livreurs des plateformes à Paris et en petite couronne, [Rapport de recherche] IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Technologies des Transports, de l'Aménagement et des Réseaux. 2022, 118p. ⟨hal-03903591⟩. Ce rapport plus récent s'appuie sur la précédente enquête de 2020.

Azaïs C. (2019), « Figures émergentes » in M.-Ch. Bureau, A. Corsani, O. Giraud & F. Rey (dir), Les Zones grises des relations de travail et d’emploi. Un dictionnaire sociologique, Buenos Aires: Editions Teseo: 149-160.

Azaïs C., P. Dieuaide  D., Kesselman (2017), « Zone grise d’emploi, pouvoir de l’employeur et espace public : une illustration à partir du cas Uber », Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations, 72 (3): 433-456.
https://doi.org/10.7202/1041092ar



Azaïs Ch., Carleial L. (eds.) (2017), La zone grise » du travail – Dynamiques d’emploi et négociation au Sud et au Nord, Bruxelles, P.I.E. Peter Lang Ed.

Berins Collier, R., Dubal, V.B., Carter, C.L. R.-B. (2018), Disrupting Regulation, Regulating Disruption: The Politics of Uber in the United States, Cambridge University Press

Bernard S. (2023), Uberusés. Le capitalisme racial de plateforme à Paris, Londres et Montréal, Paris, PUF.



Bisom-Rapp S.,  Coiquaud U. (2017), « The Role of the State towards the Grey Zone of Employment: Eyes on Canada and the United States », Interventions Economiques/Papers in Political Economy, 58.
https://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/3555

Boulin, J.-Y., Kesselman, D. (dirs.) (2018), « Work and employment grey zones: new ways to apprehend emerging labour market norms », Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research de European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Volume 24 Number 3 August 2018, numéro spécial, 6 articles. https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/trs/24/3<https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/trs/24/3>

Brodersen M., Dufresne A., Joukovsky A., Vitali Z. (2023), « Dynamiques de l’organisation collective des coursiers et des chauffeurs en Belgique : Histoires parallèles et rapprochements ambigus », Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Volume 78, numéro 3, 2023, à paraître.

Brugière F., Vandewattyne  J., Kesselman D., (dirs) (2023 à paraître), « Dynamiques de mobilisation et de syndicalisation des travailleurs de plateforme. Approche comparative transnationale et intersectorielle au sein des activités ayant trait à la mobilité », numéro spécial de la revue Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Volume 78, numéro 3, 2023, à paraître.

Bureau M.-C., Corsani A., Giraud O., Rey F. (dir.) (2019), Les Zones grises des relations de travail et d’emploi. Un dictionnaire sociologique, Buenos Aires: Teseo.
https://www.teseopress.com/dictionnaire/

Bureau M.-C.,  Dieuaide P. (2018), « Institutional change and transformations in labour and employment standards: an analysis of grey zones », Transfer, 24 (3): 261-277.
https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1024258918775573

Carelli R., Cingolani P., Kesselman D. (dirs) (2022), Les travailleurs des plateformes numériques : regards interdisciplinaires, Buenos Aires, Editions Teseo, https://www.teseopress.com/lestravailleursdesplateformesnumeriques/<https://www.teseopress.com/lestravailleursdesplateformesnumeriques/>

Carelli R., Grillo S., Oliveira M. (2021), « Concept and criticism of digital labour platforms Concept and criticism ofdigital labour platforms Concept and criticism of digital labour platforms », Labour & Law Issues, vol. 7, no. 1, file:///C:/Users/26760/Downloads/13110-Articolo-47695-3-10-20210628.pdf

Casilli A. (2019), En attendant les robots : Enquête sur le travail du clic, Editions Seuil, 2019.

Cingolani P. (2021), La colonisation du quotidien. Dans les laboratoires du capitalisme de plateforme, Amsterdam, Editions d’Amsterdam.

Cuppini N., Frapporti L. (2022), « When cities meet platforms: Towards a trans-urban approach », Digital Geography and Society, Volume 3, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378322000174



Dablanc L., Aguilera A., Krier C., Cognez A., Chretien J., Louvet N. (2022), « Etude 2022 sur les livreurs des plateformes à Paris et en petite couronne », Rapport de recherche, IFSTTAR-Institut Français des Sciences etTechnologies des Transports, de l’Aménagement, et des Réseaux.

D’Amours M. (2023), « The construction of an hybrid zone of employment and the vagaries of collective representation: the case of home childcare providers in Québec »,

Rivista trimestrale fondata da Camillo Pellizzi" 2/2023, pp. 183-208, doi: 10.1423/107857
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1423/107857

D’Amours M., Briand L., Bellemare G., Hanin F., Pogliaghi L. (2022), De l’entreprise à la reconfiguration productive : Travail, emploi, régulations, Paris, Editions Hermann.<https://supsi.academia.edu/Niccol%C3%B2Cuppini?swp=tc-au-85981680>

De Vito C.G. (2019), « History without Scale: The Micro-Spatial Perspective », Past and Present, Volume 242, Issue Supplement_14, Pages 348–372
https://academic.oup.com/past/article/242/Supplement_14/348/5637703?login=false

Dufresne A., Leterme C. (2021), « Travailleurs de plateforme. La lutte pour les droits dans l’économie numérique, Bruxelles : Gresea, Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Volume 78, numéro 3, 2023, à paraître.

Dieuaide P. (2024), « La notion de Zone Grise. Une approche nouvelle des transformations des relations de travail et d’emploi ? » in, D. Kesselman, S. Soussi, « Zone grise du travail : de quoi parle-t-on ? », Cahier du CRISES, no ET2401

Dieuaide P., Azaïs C. (2020), « Platforms of Work, Labour and Employment Relationship: The Grey Zones of a Digital Governance », Frontiers in Sociology, 5 (2).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00002

Dirringer J. (2022), « Des droits collectifs en trompe-l’œil pour les travailleurs de plateforme », La Revue de l'Ires<https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-l-ires.htm> 2022/1 (N° 106)<https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-l-ires-2022-1.htm>, pages 13 à 40/
https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-l-ires-2022-1-page-13.htm

Douki C., Minard Ph. (2007), « Histoire globale, histoires connectées : un changement d’échelle historiographique ? », Revue d’Histoire moderne & contemporaine, 2007/5 (N° 54-4 Bis), pp. 7-21.

Dubal V. (2022), « The New Racial Wage Code » Harvard Law and Policy Review, 15 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 511.

Dujarier M.A., Frayssé O. (dirs), « Discours et pratiques sur le futur du travail », Les mondes du travail, N° 31, A paraître en 2024.

Fioravanti L.M., Rangel F. Rizek C.S. (2023), « Digital platforms and urban flows: dispersion and control of precarious work » - Cadernos Metrópole, São Paulo, dezembro de 2023

Flichy P. (2019), « Le travail sur plateforme : Une activité ambivalente », Réseaux, 2019/1 n° 213, pages 173 à 209

Galbraith J.K. (2022), « Políticas econômicas, teorias e contextos sociais » in Desigualdades. Visões do Brasil e do mundo, Mattos F.A.M. de, Neto J.H., Silveira F.G. (organizadores), São Paulo, Hucitec Editora, pp. 27-34.

Gebrial D. (2022), « Racial platform capitalism: Empire, migration and the making of Uber in London », Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, pp. 1-25.

Giraud L. O., Lallement M., (eds) (2022), Decentering Comparative Analysis in a Globalizing World, Leiden, Boston, Brill.

Herzog L., Zimmermann B. (dirs.) (2023), Shifting Categories of Work: Unsettling the Ways We Think about Jobs, Labor and Activties, New York, Routledge.

Huws U., Surie<https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-11462-5#author-1-0> A. (2023), Platformization and Informality: Pathways of Change, Alteration, and Transformation, London, Palgrave Macmillan

Huws U., Spencer N.H., Syrdal D.S., Holts, K. (2017), Work in the European gig economy. Rep., Found.            Eur.     Progress.         Stud.,  Brussels. https://www.feps- europe.eu/Assets/Publications/PostFiles/579_1.pdf<https://www.feps-europe.eu/Assets/Publications/PostFiles/579_1.pdf>

Kesselman D., Soussi S. (2024), « Zone grise du travail : de quoi parle-t-on ? », Cahier du CRISES, no ET2401

Kiesling L. L. (2018), Toward a Market Epistemology of the Platform Economy. July 11, New Institutional Economics eJournal, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3229917 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3229917<https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3229917>,

Lehdonvirta V. (2020), Cloud Empires: How Digital Platforms Are Overtaking the State and How We can Regain Control, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Leterme C. (2019), L’avenir du travail vu du Sud : Critique de la « quatrième révolution industrielle », Paris, Syllepse.

Lima J.C., Bridi M. A. (2019), « Trabalho digital e emprego: a reforma trabalhista e o aprofundamento da precariedade. Cadernos CRH, v. 32, p. 325-341.

Lima J.C., Oliveira R.V. (2022), « O empreendedorismo como discurso justificador do trabalho informal e precário. Contemporânea. Revista de Sociologia da Ufscar », v. 11, p. 905-932.

Machado S., Zanoni A P.  (2022), <https://unibo.academia.edu/MattiaFrapporti?swp=tc-au-85981680> Plataformas digitais: O trabalho controlado por plataformas digitais no Brazil: dmensões, perfis e direitos<https://unibo.academia.edu/MattiaFrapporti?swp=tc-au-85981680>, Curitiba, Clinica Direito do Trabalho UFPR.<https://unibo.academia.edu/MattiaFrapporti?swp=tc-au-85981680>

Marchadour, G. (2023), « L’accompagnement syndical des mobilisations de chauffeurs VTC et de livreurs de repas en France. Les apports d’une perspective comparative et intersectionnelle », Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations, Volume 78, numéro 3, 2023, à paraître.

Minassian, G. (2011) Zones grises. Quand les États perdent le contrôle, Paris, CNRS Éditions.

Paula Leite de M.,  Bono del A., Lima J. C. (2023), « O trabalho de plataforma no Brasil e na Argentina: uma visão comparada

Platform work in Brazil and Argentina: a comparative view »
El trabajo de plataforma en Brasil y Argentina: una visión comparada, Revista brasileira de Sociologia, Vol. 11, Nº 29 | Setembro/Dezembro

Riesgo V.G. (2023), « Aprovechando y expandiendo la hiperflexibilización del empleo. El modelo Uber en España. Taking advantage of and expanding the hyper-flexibility of employment. The uber model in Spain », Revista de Metodología de Ciencias Sociales, No 59 septiembre-diciembre, 2023, pp. 23-51, https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/empiria/article/view/37934

Rizek C. S.,  Rangel F. (2023), « Controle e sentidos de autonomia na experiência dos entregadores em São Paulo »,  21o. Congresso de Sociologia -Julho

Rizek, C. S. (2023), « The emerging figures of the platform economy: the reign of the grey zones of labour »,, SASE Rio de Janeiro, July.

Rizek, C. S. Fioravanti, L Rangel, F (2022) - TRABALHO, SUBORDINAÇÃO E FLUXOS URBANOS: RESULTADOS DE PESQUISA (no prelo) SIMPURB », Curitiba dezembro de 2022

Sadik Y., Soussi S.A., (dir.) (2020), « Épistémologies des Suds »,  Revue Interventions économiques, 64 | 2020, https://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/9889

Santos R.E. dos (2022), « Expressões espaciais das relações raciais: algumas notas », Boletim Campineiro de Geografia, v. 12, n. 1, ISSN 2236-3637 1 DOI: 10.54446/bcg.v12i1.2840 Renato Emerson dos Santos

Sauviat C. (2019), « Le modèle d’affaires d’Uber : un avenir incertain », Chronique Internationale de l’IRES, 168: 51-71.
http://www.ires.fr/index.php/publications/chronique-internationale-de-l-ires/item/6111-le-modele-d-affaires-d-uber-un-avenir-incertain

Siino C., Soussi S. (eds), 2017, « Les zones grises du travail », Interventions Economiques n° 58, https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.3204

Srnicek N. (2018) Capitalisme de plateforme : L’hégémonie de l’économie numérique, Montréal: Lux Éditeur.

Supiot A. (2000), « Les nouveaux visages de la subordination », Droit social, 2: 131-145.

Van Doorn N., Ferrari F., Graham M. (2023), « Migration and migrant labour in the gig economy: An intervention », Work, Employment and Society, vol. 37, n° 4, pp. 1099-1111

Valez J., (2023), « The politics of Uber: Infrastructural power in the United States and Europe », Regulation & Governance, 2023, 17, 177-194

file:///C:/Users/26760/Downloads/Regulation%20Governance%20-%202022%20-%20Valdez%20-%20The%20politics%20of%20Uber%20Infrastructural%20power%20in%20the%20United%20States%20and%20Europe.pdf







--

Donna Kesselman, IMAGER (UR 3958) (membre associée LISE-CNAM/CNRS, UMR 3320)
Professeure des Universités


Les travailleurs des plateformes numériques : regards interdisciplinaires

Rodrigo Carelli, Patrick Cingolani, Donna Kesselman (dirs)

Editions Teseo, Buenos Aires, 2022 : Lire et télécharger :

https://www.teseopress.com/lestravailleursdesplateformesnumeriques/


UPEC-L.E.A. (Langues étrangères appliquées)
Université Paris-Est Créteil
Maison des Langues et des Relations Internationales - Mail des Mèches
4, route de Choisy
94010 Créteil Cedex  FRANCE

Courriel : donna.kesselman at u-pec.fr<mailto:donna.kesselman at u-pec.fr>
Tél pro : 01 82 69 48 66 / 48 67

[upec]